Dressurprüfung Kl. M** Kandare

NO. 7

rank participants H C M sum
1
Carolina Miesner

RFRV Scheeßel

  • H 232
    72.5%
  • C 233.5
    72.969%
  • M 235
    73.438%
  • sum 700.5
    72.969%
233.5
72.969%
235
73.438%
700.5
72.969%
2
Jolina-Amrei Hohmann

RV Vechta e.V.

  • H 226.5
    70.781%
  • C 224.5
    70.156%
  • M 222
    69.375%
  • sum 673
    70.104%
224.5
70.156%
222
69.375%
673
70.104%

You want to see all the results in the future?

  • Huge database More than 1,7 million horses
  • Exclusive videos More than 2 Million videos
  • Tried and tested Nearly 400.000 registered members

These results are presented in full due to their topicality. If you also want to see older results, you need the Pro-Membership.

Sign up for Pro
3
Hanna Rüther

RFV Brilon u.U. e.V.

  • H 221
    69.063%
  • C 219
    68.438%
  • M 221
    69.063%
  • sum 661
    68.855%
219
68.438%
221
69.063%
661
68.855%
4
Pia Sophie Giersiepen

Ländlicher RFV Kierspe e. V.

  • H 220.5
    68.906%
  • C 219
    68.438%
  • M 219.5
    68.594%
  • sum 659
    68.646%
219
68.438%
219.5
68.594%
659
68.646%
5
Anna Hilgers

RFV Attendorn-Askay e.V.

  • H 216
    67.5%
  • C 214
    66.875%
  • M 218
    68.125%
  • sum 648
    67.5%
214
66.875%
218
68.125%
648
67.5%
6
Anneke Katharina Alpers

TG Brüning-Hof e.V.

  • H 218
    68.125%
  • C 209
    65.313%
  • M 217.5
    67.969%
  • sum 644.5
    67.136%
209
65.313%
217.5
67.969%
644.5
67.136%

not placed

rank participants H C M sum
7
Lisa-Marie Drosihn

RV Fritz Sümmermann Fröndenberg e. V.

  • H 212.5
    66.406%
  • C 214
    66.875%
  • M 216
    67.5%
  • sum 642.5
    66.927%
214
66.875%
216
67.5%
642.5
66.927%
8
Marei Flunkert

Landw. RV Kalthof e.V.

  • H 211
    65.938%
  • C 212.5
    66.406%
  • M 217
    67.813%
  • sum 640.5
    66.719%
212.5
66.406%
217
67.813%
640.5
66.719%

You want to see all the results in the future?

  • Huge database More than 1,7 million horses
  • Exclusive videos More than 2 Million videos
  • Tried and tested Nearly 400.000 registered members

These results are presented in full due to their topicality. If you also want to see older results, you need the Pro-Membership.

Sign up for Pro
9
Carla Marie Degener

RFV Graf Haeseler Wallenbrück e.V.

  • H 212
    66.25%
  • C 211.5
    66.094%
  • M 211.5
    66.094%
  • sum 635
    66.146%
211.5
66.094%
211.5
66.094%
635
66.146%
10
Emma Wagner

RUFV Cloppenburg

  • H 210
    65.625%
  • C 209.5
    65.469%
  • M 210
    65.625%
  • sum 629.5
    65.573%
209.5
65.469%
210
65.625%
629.5
65.573%
11
Amy Krull

RUFV Boerger

  • H 210
    65.625%
  • C 209
    65.313%
  • M 210
    65.625%
  • sum 629
    65.521%
209
65.313%
210
65.625%
629
65.521%
12
Elina Palm

RV Ganderkesee

  • H 210.5
    65.781%
  • C 205
    64.063%
  • M 212
    66.25%
  • sum 627.5
    65.365%
205
64.063%
212
66.25%
627.5
65.365%
13
Zsofia Baunoch

  • H 210.5
    65.781%
  • C 208
    65%
  • M 207.5
    64.844%
  • sum 626
    65.208%
208
65%
207.5
64.844%
626
65.208%
14
Pia Sophie Giersiepen

Ländlicher RFV Kierspe e. V.

  • H 204.5
    63.906%
  • C 205.5
    64.219%
  • M 209.5
    65.469%
  • sum 619.5
    64.531%
205.5
64.219%
209.5
65.469%
619.5
64.531%
15
Katharina Münster

RFV Havixbeck-Hohenholte e.V.

  • H 205.5
    64.219%
  • C 205
    64.063%
  • M 206.5
    64.531%
  • sum 617
    64.271%
205
64.063%
206.5
64.531%
617
64.271%
16
Marlena Brenner

RUFV Emlichheim e.V.

  • H 195
    60.938%
  • C 193.5
    60.469%
  • M 195.5
    61.094%
  • sum 584
    60.834%
193.5
60.469%
195.5
61.094%
584
60.834%